Educational Studies and PE Subject Taster Day at the University of East Anglia Wed 24 April 2013

University Taster Day Events

Email Enquiry
More Info

University of East Anglia

Discover Education / Physical education


Event Summary:

Educational studies and Physical Education subject taster


Full Event Details:

Discover Education 
(includes Physical Education) 

Discover more about studying educational studies at undergraduate level. Two pathways will be offered at this event: Physical Education and Educational Studies (including Early Years Studies). Each group will take part in interactive seminars, with the Physical Education sessions taking part in the university’s award-winning Sportspark. You will have the opportunity to meet current undergraduate students and learn how to write a convincing personal statement. 
This event is not just for those aiming to become teachers! A degree in Educational Studies prepares students for diverse career opportunities in a wide range of settings. 

Wednesday 24 April 
9.30am – 2.45pm, £10, Year 12 


Suitable For: 
Key Stage 5 (Students aged 16-18)
Individuals (Aged 16+ not booking event through an Institution)
Duration: Full Day
Min. Students: 1

 


Dates Available:

This event is delivered at the university on the following date(s):
24th April 2013

 

Telegraph Article on changes proposed for teachers pay

Let’s pay each teacher what they’re worth

from The Telegraph

Salary rises should be based on performance in the classroom, rather than just time served

It is about time heads and governing bodies added pay progression linked to appraisal for all teachers - Let’s pay each teacher what they’re worth

It is about time heads and governing bodies added pay progression linked to appraisal for all teachers Photo: Alamy

Good teaching matters. Talented teachers change lives, but are not sufficiently recognised or rewarded. And too often good teaching is not available where it is most needed, particularly in deprived areas. That’s why the School Teachers’ Pay Review Body, in its report published yesterday, recommends that teachers’ pay should be based on the impact made in the classroom rather than time served.

There are many factors that make a good school, but the best teachers are not always paid as they should be, nor is the sector seen by graduates in the profession as offering the status and rewards available elsewhere. Successive governments have begun to tackle this, with the Teach First initiative and the introduction of appraisals to inform pay decisions for senior teachers.

The independent review body recommends in its report that the Government should simplify the national pay framework and extend pay awards based on appraisal to all teachers. This is what happens in most sectors. Pay for all teachers should be based on their contribution to pupils’ progress. Individual schools are best placed to understand pupil needs and local circumstances and should be free to spend their money as they see fit, within the national framework.

It is 20 years since schools won the right to manage their own budgets and recruit staff. It is about time heads and governing bodies added pay progression linked to appraisal for all teachers. They are in the best position, after all, to know which teachers are making most impact.

Appraisals for teachers were introduced 20 years ago but didn’t affect pay. Ten years ago, pay progression linked to performance was introduced for experienced classroom teachers as well as leadership teams. But freedom for schools to promote the best teachers to those grades has been limited by budgets and by rigid and opaque regulations. There has been no flexibility for new teachers during their first six years of employment. At this stage, the main choice for heads has been whether to pay an automatic increment set on a national scale or place a teacher in capability proceedings, leading to dismissal.

This is bad for attracting the most talented to the profession, bad for schools in disadvantaged areas who want the freedom to attract and retain the best teachers, and bad for any teacher who is struggling and needs professional development. Staff, especially at a professional level, expect appraisals and pay to reflect how well they do their job. This happens in over 85 per cent of the private sector, 60 per cent of the voluntary sector and over half of the public sector.

The review body visited schools and took evidence from teachers’ unions as well as head teachers’ and employers’ bodies. We were impressed by arguments about the need for more flexibility, as well as concerns that appraisal should be fair and transparent. Many warned about the capacity of the system to cope with change, so we kept it simple and within the existing framework. We recommend:

-) Performance-based progression for all teachers, based on a school’s own priorities and the single teaching standard already in place, with freedom for the most successful teachers to move faster up the pay scale.

-) More freedom for schools to create highly paid posts for the very best teachers, to spread good teaching skills and provide a classroom career alternative to leadership.

-) Simplifying hundreds of pages of detailed central guidance which it is clear that few fully understood.

These are measured reforms. We recommend keeping the national pay framework for London and elsewhere to inform career planning for new recruits, provide a framework for fair pay decisions and protect against pay drift. Further relaxation in future should be possible as the economy permits and schools gain experience in managing flexibility.

Teachers must, of course, have confidence in the fairness and probity of any pay system. Retaining the familiar framework means that good teachers know they should still expect to move up the main scale as before. Pay policies would need, as now, to be approved by governing bodies, and their management subject to Ofsted inspection.

But clear and simple pathways would open up to successful teachers, either into leadership or into highly paid classroom posts. Really high-calibre teachers could reach the upper pay scale more rapidly. Failing teachers would not be rewarded for failure. More flexibility with recruitment and retention payments and a new temporary allowance of up to £2,500 a year, payable to teachers taking short-term management responsibilities, would provide more tools for heads to recruit, retain and reward the best teachers.

The group commissioned an analysis of teachers’ pay compared with other graduate professions. We discovered complexities far beyond the London effect. In urban areas, we found that teachers’ median earnings were likely to trail those of other professionals. But schools in the same city or only a mile or two apart can face very different challenges.

Our proposals will enable schools to pay according to needs, circumstance and teacher ability, within a national professional framework. We believe it will serve pupils well, especially in areas of disadvantage, and do much to raise the status and quality of teaching.

 

Dame Patricia Hodgson is chairman of the School Teachers’ Review Body

Article in the Telegraph on level of Maths education of teachers!

Maths taught by teachers with just a C-grade at GCSE

Pupils are lagging behind in maths because some primary school teachers only have a C-grade GCSE in the subject.

Music helps children learn maths

Prof Burghes says that he has gained “enjoyment, inspiration, challenge and, at times, despair” from maths. Photo: Getty Images

Professor David Burghes warned that revamping secondary school maths is simply “putting a sticking plaster on the cracks” and that changes need to be made in primary schools.

He said that too many primary school teachers have only studied maths to GCSE, and do not have a good enough understanding of the subject.

As a result, children eventually end up either bored, or struggling with maths.

In a new pamphlet for the Politeia think tank Prof Burghes, professor of mathematics teaching at Plymouth University, puts forward proposals for a new maths curriculum for primary schools.

He said that England should learn from high-performing nations such as Finland, Japan and Singapore, where teachers have better maths skills and pupils must learn key topics by certain ages.

Far less is expected of pupils in England, and too much time is spent learning about simple topics like space and shape, rather than algebra, he said.

“The quality of the mathematical knowledge of teachers remains an important influence,” Prof Burghes says in the pamphlet.

“The majority of entrants to the profession have only a GCSE C grade as their highest mathematical qualification.

“The emphasis throughout primary is on numeracy and accessible topics in, for example, shape and space, rather than the provision of a mathematical foundation (including algebra) on which to build in the secondary sector.”

Prof Burghes adds: “We have too few teachers at primary school with a real understanding of mathematics, leading to children not being fully extended; the pupils continue into the secondary stage, where there is a shortage of adequately trained mathematicians so that many of them are either bored or not coping.

“This results in not enough students in the sixth form taking mathematics and low numbers of students undertaking mathematics or mathematics-related degrees at universities. The cycle continues with not enough mathematically well qualified young people entering the teaching profession.”

Prof Burghes sets out proposals for a new maths curriculum that would see children learn their times tables up to 10 times 10 by the end of Year 2, age seven.

By this time they would also have learnt how to use numbers up to 100, as well as add, subtract, multiply and divide.

Algebra should be introduced at an early age, Prof Burghes says, similar to other high-performing nations, and pupils should be able to solve simple equations and inequalities by the time they are eight-years-old.

At this age they should also be able to calculate simple probabilities, he adds.

But he says fractions should not be introduced in the first year of primary school, and left until a year later.

By the time they are 11, and ready to go to secondary school, pupils should be able to multiply and divide fractions, use simple percentages, decimals, as well understand ideas such as radius, diameter and circumference of a circle.

Prof Burghes says that he has gained “enjoyment, inspiration, challenge and, at times, despair” from maths, but adds “it is obvious that many of our school children (and their teachers!) do not experience even a fraction of this emotion and enjoyment but are bored with the subject.

“This is regrettable and not helpful at a time when, in an increasingly technological world, we need young people who are confident, capable and able to use their mathematical skills and knowledge in new and challenging contexts.

“I make no apology for concentrating on primary mathematics. Anything else at any other level is just ‘putting sticking plaster on the cracks’ of lack of understanding of the subject, rather than providing a long-term and sustainable solution.”

Ministers announced plans for a new back-to-basics primary maths curriculum in June.

Under the proposals, pupils will be expected to know all their times tables up to 12 times 12 by age nine, whereas under the current system they should know their tables up to 10 times 10 by the end of primary school.

By the age of seven, children will be expected to have memorised all so-called “number bonds” – simple addition and subtraction sums such as 9+9=18 or 15-6=9 – up to 20.

And by the time they are 11, children will be expected to be able to add, subtract, multiply and divide fractions and decimals.

Many of these topics are not covered by the current curriculum, which means that pupils struggle when they get to secondary school and do not have the right grounding for more difficult concepts such as algebra, the Department for Education has said.

A Department for Education spokesman said: “We place a high priority on providing a solid grounding of arithmetic early on in schools. It is important that pupils are fluent in calculation and have learnt the multiplication tables by heart before they leave primary school.

“That’s why we are driving up standards in schools across the country with plans for a more stretching primary curriculum, which includes banning calculators for Key Stage 2 tests. We are also encouraging more new primary teachers to specialise in maths and we are prioritising funding for graduates with a 2:1 or first class degree in the subject.”